Joe.Blog

Joe Hardy writes on music, both old and new

Hot Topics on Joe.Blog

new music review australian live sydney radiohead electronica gotye mp3 photo basics audiomulch gigs video
28 Jul 2005

Sarah Blasko and the Great Church Pay-out Dilemma

Filed under:

My bleary brain doth seek to utter comment, but fear not should this turn into a jumbled mishmash of mumbling, for the dreaded common cold: yea, it be unpleasant.

Found the remarks from Sarah Blasko in this morning’s SMH about her experience with the church a little sad…

“So often I heard the Anglican church pay out the Pentecostal church and the Pentecostals pay out the Anglicans. There’s no love within the denominations and to me that’s just proof that something’s really wrong.”

I find this sad simply because this appears to be one of the primary lasting impressions following her being an active part of a church – yes, I realise that SMH could possibly have turned an off-the-cuff comment into a big soundbite, but the statement still stands. I don’t know what her experience was – may have been an extreme case, I don’t know – but it strikes a chord with me.

We have the responsibility of being witnesses before men on behalf of God, and this segregation between camps does concern me a good deal. Both sides appear to regard the other with a large dose of suspicion and (however unintentionally) a sense of inferiority – . I’ve seen it too much in many cases on both sides and wonder where on earth the general impression comes from that one of the ’sides’ is God’s special club. There’s never (usually) too much doubt that the ‘other guys’ are part of the kingdom, sure, but they are, of course, definitely “works in progress”.

Why is it so easy to completely lose sight of the one thing that matters to us as a Christian people – our redeemed status in Christ before the one God in Heaven? (OK, I shouldn’t be rush-writing a one sentence summary of Christianity… but you know what I’m trying to say) The rest is a matter of details – we can work that out later. I’m not saying that it doesn’t require a lot of effort to separate oneself from the things in their church’s doctrine that they feel are important, but really I think the key issue in question is humility and a healthy view of our understandings in light of a God that is so much bigger than the hugely inferior abilities we have to comprehend or express His character and work.

Pardon the rant. All the snide remarks and frequent digs (for which I also am guilty by the way, I’m not excluding myself from this criticism): are they going to build up the body?

2 Comments »

  1. That–this incessant bagging of other denominations–is something I’ve noticed often in the church realm. That’s why i tend to avoid labelling myself altogether. That, or I run through *all* the denominations I’ve been a part of in my life. Whatever happened to plain and simple CHURCH? i think we’ve lost the plot in this regard.

    Comment by Danielle — July 30, 2005 @ 6:53 am

  2. It doesn’t make sense to have standards stricter than Jesus. Its only when we put it something like this: ” Its well and good for Jesus to accept someone but my standards are sricter than his” that we realise how stupid an attitude this is.

    Hasn’t stopped me and many others from holding this point of view in the past however.

    By the way has Sarah’s search led her any closer to faith in Jesus these days.

    Comment by Paul Mostyn — December 8, 2006 @ 9:42 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment