<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are music blogs an easy way out for paid journos?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joe.hardy.id.au/blog/2008/10/31/are-music-blogs-an-easy-way-out-for-paid-journos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joe.hardy.id.au/blog/2008/10/31/are-music-blogs-an-easy-way-out-for-paid-journos/</link>
	<description>An Australian music blog by Joe Hardy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 12:15:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://joe.hardy.id.au/blog/2008/10/31/are-music-blogs-an-easy-way-out-for-paid-journos/comment-page-1/#comment-158429</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joe.hardy.id.au/blog/?p=605#comment-158429</guid>
		<description>just a correction - it was actually my radio cohort dave who started this, it was he that dissected the review on the to and fro blog, not me..

but we are all united in the pro-qua voltron, which joe i believe you have just joined. you can be the foot. dave and i are the left &amp; right nuts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just a correction &#8211; it was actually my radio cohort dave who started this, it was he that dissected the review on the to and fro blog, not me..</p>
<p>but we are all united in the pro-qua voltron, which joe i believe you have just joined. you can be the foot. dave and i are the left &amp; right nuts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://joe.hardy.id.au/blog/2008/10/31/are-music-blogs-an-easy-way-out-for-paid-journos/comment-page-1/#comment-158385</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joe.hardy.id.au/blog/?p=605#comment-158385</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m actually one of those wank intellectuals who does research on Pierre Schaeffer and musique concrète. I thought I&#039;d add one more gripe to your list of Ms. Northover&#039;s egregious errors:

The phrase &quot;atonal composer Pierre Schaeffer&quot; is misleading. Did Schaeffer compose atonal music? Usually the adjective &quot;atonal,&quot; when used in conjunction with electronic music, is reserved for composers who were influenced by serial music, not concrète composers. In fact, Schaeffer was extraordinarily critical of atonality and the rationalist means by which it was organized (he called it, derisively, &quot;music a priori&quot;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually one of those wank intellectuals who does research on Pierre Schaeffer and musique concrète. I thought I&#8217;d add one more gripe to your list of Ms. Northover&#8217;s egregious errors:</p>
<p>The phrase &#8220;atonal composer Pierre Schaeffer&#8221; is misleading. Did Schaeffer compose atonal music? Usually the adjective &#8220;atonal,&#8221; when used in conjunction with electronic music, is reserved for composers who were influenced by serial music, not concrète composers. In fact, Schaeffer was extraordinarily critical of atonality and the rationalist means by which it was organized (he called it, derisively, &#8220;music a priori&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

