Joe.Blog

Joe Hardy writes on music, both old and new

Hot Topics on Joe.Blog

new music review sydney australian live radiohead mp3 video gotye electronica photo basics audiomulch gigs
14 Jan 2009

Hudson Mohawke

hudson-mohawke

This may be classed as next-big-thing bandwagon jumping, but these tunes have got me roped in somewhat…

Glasgow’s hip-hop beatmaker extraordinaire Hudson Mohawke has been getting some attention of late thanks to his rather energetic and unique sounds – and whose buzz factor has only accelerated since Warp Records’ succeeded in signing him. Hud Mo’s style is centred upon loose, off-kilter beats not dissimilar to the influential work of the likes of Madlib and the late great J Dilla, but also features a bright, playful melodic style and some great pop hooks nestled amongst the action.

His album Polyfolk Dance is out on January 26th, but if you’re curious here are two tunes that were included on a pre-release sampler (which can be purchased now on Bleep)

Hud Mo has another project called Heralds of Change – a collab with fellow Glaswegian Mike Slott – which also features fractured beats set against a darker, grittier canvas. The band’s releases come via the All City Dublin label, and is available for purchase on Bleep as well.

  • Future (mp3 currently unavailable – coming soon)
19 Nov 2007

Glitch VST

Filed under: , ,

Sound granulators/rearrangers/stutter algorithms/etc can often be love it or hate it tools for many people. Many people like to chop up and refigure their drum breaks, programs and sounds, but their methods can vary wildly. Some like to do everything manually – buried in mountains of edits and parameters and grids and inserts. Others like to use stuff like ReCycle, BBCut (and its many implementations) and SupaTrigger – to name but a few.

I’m not sure where I sit on the whole thing. Generally I tend to go for the more manual route – I think it’s because I like to have full control over the musical process, I like the musical ideas to be mine and not a variant of some algorithm that someone else created – falling into the trap of thinking like someone else. I don’t have any thought out rationale for it – and I certainly have some of the tools mentioned above installed on my computer (and their siblings) as they’re useful to have around, if only to get inspired when searching for new sounds and ideas. But generally when it comes to the sounds that find their way into my final work, I tend to go a bit manual.

But whatever you think of all that, I’ve been playing around today with a little gizmo called Glitch, which is a freeware VST tool that allows for applying various rhythm-oriented manipulations – stuff like chops, stutters, recuts. It’s pretty funky in that it’s actually quite in-depth: it’s got a lot of functionality and you have a reasonable amount of control over what it’s actually doing, rather than some programs which are almost black boxes that have a few parameters that can be played with.

Glitch

This has a sequencer for the various types of manipulations, and the parameters on offer for each are pretty detailed. At the very least it’s a fun way to completely mess up sounds and breaks and some of the results are really quite interesting. I think it’s very likely to be the most impressive free package I’ve seen offering this kind of functionality.

Anyway, if you’re into going for some haywire manipulations, have a play with Glitch, it’s an interesting tool. Next time I want to do some really intense edits on a break, I’ll certainly have a good think about whether I want to be sitting in front of a grid or writing out sub-divisions and rhythms on paper. Which option I’ll choose is still unknown, but at the very least it’s the kind of thing that’s worth having there just in case. The flexibility it offers is certainly tempting.

Naturally, of course, this is worlds away from a dude like Burial (who I’ve been listening to a fair bit of the last week and really digging) who does all his beats in SoundForge. No grids or anything. Insane.